It was also equally 
        inconceivable in the circumstances that he did not inform his publishers 
        of the situation. During the famous 1963 trial the publishers swore in 
        an affidavit that they had no knowledge of any of the matters relating 
        to the question of copyright. It was a fact they knew very well. 
        
        Months prior to the publication of THUNDERBALL, George Wren Howard, the 
        director and chairman of Jonathan Cape, was alerted to McClory’s 
        connection with the Bond story and that he claimed ownership of the 
        material and intended to sue. But Jonathan Cape’s plans for publishing 
        THUNDERBALL were so far advanced Howard saw it as nothing short of, 
        “disastrous if anything occurred to oblige us to postpone publication.” 
        In fact the decision to halt publication rested on the shoulders of only 
        one man, Fleming himself. And he quickly made it plain that he had no 
        intention of stopping THUNDERBALL from hitting bookshelves. In the view 
        of Philip McNair, a lawyer at Fleming’s American agent MCA, it was a 
        case now, with the threat of possible injunctions hanging over their 
        heads, “of taking a calculated risk as to which way McClory can or 
        will jump.” It was then a massive gamble publishing THUNDERBALL. 
        
        Of course McClory sued and at the trial Jonathan Cape’s George Wren 
        Howard, in his sworn affidavit, said that he knew nothing of McClory’s 
        claims of ownership in the THUNDERBALL story. Of course he knew. In 
        other words, one of Britain’s biggest and most respected publishers of 
        the time lied under oath. 
        8: 
        Many people have claimed that Ivar Bryce, after days of wrestling with 
        his conscience during the trial, finally decided to settle rather than 
        watch his beloved friend Ian Fleming, already desperately ill, endure 
        the days to come. There is evidence that Fleming’s health was in an even 
        worse state than previously thought. In a family letter dated 1967 Jack 
        Whittingham wrote that Bryce had revealed to him that, “…Fleming had 
        two very bad heart attacks during the court case.” 
        
        Another and much more controversial, and previously never revealed, 
        reason for the quick settlement is the revelation that McClory may have 
        had in his personal possession an incriminating letter against his 
        opponents. Bryce’s sudden decision to settle, so this theory goes, was 
        to prevent the letter seeing daylight and causing public embarrassment 
        both to Fleming and himself. Significantly, at the close of the trial, 
        Bryce’s QC handed a letter to the judge saying, “I think it would be 
        unwise for me to comment publicly on this letter.” After reading it 
        the judge observed, “All I can say about this is that I am very 
        surprised to see it.” The contents and author of the letter were 
        never made public, and its whereabouts, if indeed it even still exists, 
        is a mystery.
        
        As a side-note to this mysterious letter, Bryce, when writing to 
        Fleming, would sometimes begin his correspondence with the endearment 
        “Dear Boy.” Even more strangely, in one letter to McClory, Bryce 
        signed off with the words “love and kisses.” Hardly the language 
        one would use in a letter to another man?