007 MAGAZINE - The World's Foremost James Bond Resource!

From the Archive
007 MAGAZINE Online
Issue #49 (August 2006)

007 MAGAZINE HOME  •  JAMES BOND NEWS  •  FACT FILES  •  MAIN MENU  •  PURCHASE 007 MAGAZINE

 
BILLION DOLLAR BOND! from
GoldenEye
to
Die Another Day

GREG BECHTLOFF assesses Pierce Brosnan’s four film tenure as the James Bond of the Nineties, arguably the most popular and successful actor  to inhabit the role since Sean Connery.

BILLION DOLLAR BOND! was originally available exclusively to subscribers of 007 MAGAZINE OnLine as part of 007 MAGAZINE Issue #49 in August 2006. Due to its length, the feature was not included in the printed edition of Issue #49 in February 2018; but was published as a standalone 007 MAGAZINE Special Publication in May 2018, enhanced with many rare and never-before seen photographs from Pierce Brosnan's four James Bond films.

When Daniel Craig took that speed boat ride up the Thames in October 2005 a new James Bond incumbency was officially beginning. What we did not see though was the official end of another Bond’s term; that of Pierce Brosnan, the Irish actor who held the reins from June 1994. Like the inauguration of an American President, the celebration of a formal investiture also signifies the official end of the previous reign.

With a new James Bond term just beginning only now can we properly assess the Pierce Brosnan era in the overall context of the James Bond film cycle. 007 MAGAZINE here presents one man’s guide to the good, the bad, and the ugly of Pierce Brosnan’s James Bond films.

The James Bond Identikit

What makes a good James Bond? Is it strictly the financial returns of his films? Is it the acceptance by the fans? Is it acceptance by the general public? Is it adherence to what Ian Fleming created in his novels? There is no one definitive answer and success in the role certainly encompasses all the criteria mentioned above.

As a visual medium, actors are a vital element to the successful realization of a motion picture. A great script, assured direction, amazing music and tight editing can all be ruined by poor acting. The Bond films are not immune to these laws of cinema and the casting of a James Bond has always been a very serious affair.

For James Bond the problem is magnified because this is not a one-off role. This is a series, a franchise, and anyone taking on the character has the potential to play the role for many films. This has proved to be a blessing and a curse for James Bond actors. On the one hand, the Bond role makes that actor an internationally known commodity. On the other hand, the role can be a trap which typecasts said actor into similar roles and prevents him from more disparate and challenging parts. Every James Bond actor has faced this paradox and all of them have had differing responses to it.

Pierce Brosnan silver gun barrel

Ian Fleming (1908-1964)

Ian Fleming (1908-1964)

John Gavin (1931-2018)

John Gavin (1931-2018)

James Mason (1909-1984)

James Mason (1909-1984)

Sean Connery (1930-2020)

Sean Connery (1930-2020)

George Lazenby (1939- )

George Lazenby (1939- )

The role itself is pedigreed in that it had a life before celluloid in the novels of Ian Fleming. Fleming’s James Bond is an Englishman (of Scottish descent) in his mid-thirties with black hair, blue eyes, and a scar on his face. Bond is an agent of the British Secret Service. He is an orphan who lives in London and travels the globe on missions for his country. He has many love affairs with women but is not married. Bond dresses well, eats well and is expert in such pursuits as golf and cards. Fleming’s Bond is described by another character to resemble the American songwriter Hoagy Carmichael.

The generic characteristics for casting the cinematic James Bond more or less followed these guidelines; Bond is tall, dark and handsome although the ‘dark’ part has been fudged a bit in the cases of Roger Moore and more recently Daniel Craig. The film Bond is in the thirty-to-forty something age range. Bond actors are ‘British’ as opposed to the Englishman of the Fleming novels. This means that a Bond actor can hail from England, Ireland, Scotland, Wales and even Commonwealth countries such as Australia. At a pinch it can be an American actor as it almost was with John Gavin in 1970. James Bond is portrayed as English in the films even though most of the actors who have played him are not.

Also important for a James Bond actor is his profile before being cast as Bond. A high wattage star has never been cast as Bond. Established actors such as Cary Grant, James Mason, Burt Reynolds and Michael Caine have all been floated and/or offered the role at various times in the series. The practice though has been to cast a relative or total unknown and let the role make them a star. By ‘relative’ we also mean actors who may be known as stars in one medium or country but not known around the world. This would include the television careers of Roger Moore and Pierce Brosnan, which incidentally made both actors familiar to American audiences, a vital element in casting a successful James Bond.

It is certainly no secret that the first cinematic James Bond, Sean Connery was a success in the role. The producers found in Sean Connery the successor to Clark Gable; a vital, charismatic man’s man who was capable of exuding danger when called upon. Connery was so successful in the role that many people believed that the Bond character could not survive his departure. Much to the personal chagrin of Sean Connery, many people also believed that his persona was the same as James Bond’s. It isn’t and never was. This was not a thought shared by Ian Fleming who initially was not pleased at the casting of Sean Connery in Dr. No. Fleming eventually came round and in fact adapted the literary Bond to some of Connery’s characteristics, namely a Scottish past. If he had had his way though, Fleming would have gone with a more English actor in the David Niven mould.

When Connery did leave in 1967 after the release of You Only Live Twice, Australian model George Lazenby took over the James Bond role for one film. Lazenby was younger than Connery was when he became Bond but had the rugged good looks that gave him an older, harder look than Connery. Lazenby did turn in a decent performance in an otherwise outstanding Bond film but many filmgoers and critics dubbed it a failure in the belief that Lazenby was only emulating Connery/Bond rather than creating a new interpretation of the character. Even though the film On Her Majesty’s Secret Service did well at the box office and was a triumphant Ian Fleming adaptation, efforts were made to bring Connery back. Connery did return for one film only in Diamonds Are Forever, and in 1973 the role passed onto Englishman Roger Moore, who had been eyed as a potential James Bond from the very beginning of the series.

Hoagy Carmichael (1899-1981)

Hoagy Carmichael (1899-1981)

Cary Grant (1904-1986)

Cary Grant (1904-1986)

Burt Reynolds (1936-2018)

Burt Reynolds (1936-2018)

David Niven (1910-1983)

David Niven (1910-1983)

Roger Moore (1927-2017)

Roger Moore (1927-2017)

It took a few films for the former Saint to grow into the role but eventually Roger Moore became as successful a James Bond as Sean Connery had been, perhaps even more so, for a certain generation of Bond fans (this author included) Roger Moore was the touchstone. He was the James Bond that we grew up with.

Roger Moore knew that he could never compete with Sean Connery in the public’s mind and therefore imbued his James Bond with his own persona; that of the insouciant English playboy who used charm, wit and a sophisticated comeback to get through his missions with panache. Moore’s approach drew on the tradition of George Sanders, Rex Harrison and David Niven, whom Fleming himself had originally in mind for James Bond.

At the time of Roger Moore’s retirement from the role in 1986, Pierce Brosnan was the obvious choice to take over. In fact Brosnan was cast as Bond for the 1987 film The Living Daylights but had to pull out over a contractual problem with his American television series Remington Steele.

Cast instead was Welsh actor Timothy Dalton who had built a solid reputation shuttling between the stage, film and television, usually in historical or literary dramas. Dalton bravely drew his Bond interpretation from the character Ian Fleming sketched in the novels rather than emulating Connery or Moore. This made for interesting viewing for Fleming fans but the general public never really embraced Dalton’s take on the role. Timothy Dalton’s two films suffered from poor marketing which combined with his unloved interpretation of Bond marked his tenure as a failure. In fact it is still murky to this day as to whether Dalton was fired from the role or stepped aside voluntarily.

One important point to make with the Timothy Dalton approach was that the James Bond of the cinema and the James Bond of the novels had grown far apart by the time Dalton took on the role.

Timothy Dalton (1944- )

Timothy Dalton (1944- )

Cinema is a visual medium and 25 years of Connery and Moore as James Bond had forever altered who and what a James Bond should be in cinematic terms. While embodying Ian Fleming’s James Bond appealed to Fleming fans (this author included) it was not accepted by the far greater number of fans who only knew the character through the films as personified by Sean Connery and Roger Moore. In other words, the character embodied by actors such as Connery and Moore had now eclipsed in the general public’s mind what had originally been created by author Ian Fleming.

Pierce Brosnan (1953-)

Pierce Brosnan (1953- )
 
in Remington Steele (1982-87)

All of which brings us to Pierce Brosnan’s tenure in the role. Coinciding with legal problems that stopped the Bond film series between 1990 and 1993, the casting of Pierce Brosnan in 1994 signalled that the Bond series was poised for a large scale comeback. Brosnan said at his first press conference as the new 007 that his Bond would be “flinty” and efforts would be made to peel back some of the character’s layers to reveal the inner demons that drive Bond.

To begin with though, Pierce Brosnan was physically a very good fit for James Bond. Tall and lean, Brosnan also had the dark hair and blue eyes that Ian Fleming wrote in the novels. Brosnan also had that comma of black hair that would forever fall over his right eye. After a mishap on the set of Tomorrow Never Dies, Brosnan now even had a small scar on his face.

Pierce Brosnan with his wife Cassandra Harris

Pierce Brosnan with his wife Cassandra Harris (1948-1991)

The casting problem that prevented Brosnan from becoming the fourth James Bond in 1987 had in a way been a good thing. The Pierce Brosnan of Remington Steele was too callow and ‘pretty’ to be a proper James Bond. By 1994, Brosnan had a more weathered and interesting face than he did in 1986 and his personal history (albeit sub rosa) influenced his portrayal of James Bond. For it was in 1991 that Brosnan lost his wife Cassandra Harris to cancer, herself a veteran of the Roger Moore Bond film, For Your Eyes Only, Harris and Brosnan had an enduring marriage. So it was somewhat ironic that the widower Pierce Brosnan would now play the widower James Bond.

Although rarely mentioned in the film series, the James Bond that Pierce Brosnan would play was a world-weary veteran who had lost his wife of a day on a previous mission. The series had not yet come to the starting over point that was to begin with the 2006 version of Casino Royale. The key word in 1995 was ‘update’ not ‘re-master’.

CONTINUED


ARTICLES ARCHIVE

GoldenEye FACT FILE